From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 10:59:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4698D16A4B3 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from procyon.firepipe.net (procyon.firepipe.net [198.78.66.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4436243FAF for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:59:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by procyon.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2EBBB20E51; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:59:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:59:12 -0700 From: Will Andrews To: FreeBSD Ports Message-ID: <20031010175912.GB11324@procyon.firepipe.net> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Ports References: <3F8618C1.6050602@fillmore-labs.com> <20031010151236.872.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20031010172808.GL96543@toxic.magnesium.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031010172808.GL96543@toxic.magnesium.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: ports that should use CONFLICTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:59:13 -0000 On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:28:08PM -0400, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >> (10.10.2003 @ 1112 PST): Thomas-Martin Seck said, in 1.9K: << > > It seems that pkg_add should be tought to ignore unknown declarations in > > package files. > > What does that mean? I suspect he means it should be taught to ignore things like "@conflicts" if it does not recognize it. Noble idea, but we can't apply such a change retroactively. The best way to solve pkg_info conflicts is to force a newer version on them through sysutils/pkg_install. Unfortunately that hasn't been implemented yet, although it is trivial to do. regards, -- wca