From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 07:46:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60BE16A4CF; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:46:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969C443D41; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:46:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413E9548A2; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:46:56 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D0D086D455; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:46:55 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:46:55 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20040226154655.GE46714@madman.celabo.org> References: <200402260234.i1Q2YDx1014240@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040226060126.GA70201@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040226060126.GA70201@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: Max Laier cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/pf/net if_pflog.c if_pflog.h if_pfsync.c if_pfsync.h pf.c pf_ioctl.c pf_norm.c pf_osfp.c pf_table.c pfvar.h src/sys/contrib/pf/netinet in4_cksum.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:46:57 -0000 [Disclaimer: I am long-time, loyal IPFilter user and I think everything else is crap. :-) ] On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:01:26PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > Was this import discussed on arch@ or current@? We now have ipfw, ipfilter, > and pf in the base system. How many more firewall packages are we going > to import into the base system? Are you going to remove ipfw or ipfilter? > Is there a NO_PF make.conf knob? Choice is good. Three firewalls is maybe pushing the limit, but these three are Very Important to our community. NO_PF, NO_IPF, and NO_IPFW would be good--- anyone have tested patches? The only downside IMHO is now I have to watch for security issues in pf :-) Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org