From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 5 17:56:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B2D106564A for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arctic@alkar.net) Received: from cmail.optima.ua (cmail.optima.ua [195.248.191.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AED8FC0C for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arctic@alkar.net) Received: from [212.86.226.214] (account arctic@alkar.net HELO [127.0.0.1]) by cmail.optima.ua (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.9) with ESMTPA id 250786696; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:56:34 +0300 From: "Andrey O.Sokolov" To: Nikos Vassiliadis In-Reply-To: <4A79C44D.8040803@gmx.com> References: <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793F2F9@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <1249493435.3092.45.camel@Father> <4A79C44D.8040803@gmx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-R" Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:57:14 +0300 Message-Id: <1249495034.3092.58.camel@Father> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2tml@iki.fi evolution_2.24.2-1_win32 20090105 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Gary Gatten , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [?? Probable Spam] Re: Network card Intel and 802.1P tag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: arctic@alkar.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:56:36 -0000 õ óÒ, 2009-08-05 Õ 20:41 +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis ÐÉÛÅ: > >> Is the vlan hardware processing enabled? > > > > How I can enable this processing? > > > > "ifconfig em0 vlanhwtag" enables vlan processing in hw > "ifconfig em0 -vlanhwtag" disables vlan processing in hw > Maybe one these will work correctly without the zeroing effect. I tried both variant on both NIC - fxp and em The result doesn't change ;( > Perhaps off topic, but why are you interested in priority > tags, since FreeBSD will silently ignore them? I developing QoS-model for big network. I have casualy found out this problem, when I analyzed the traffic with different COS-value from various devices. -- ***AOS224-RIPE*** mailto:arctic@alkar.net