From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Nov 18 12:05:01 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA08507 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 12:05:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA08494 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 12:04:56 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id OAA02958; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 14:02:58 -0600 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199611182002.OAA02958@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: changed to: Frac T3? To: tli@jnx.com (Tony Li) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 14:02:58 -0600 (CST) Cc: dennis@etinc.com, isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199611181929.LAA13795@chimp.jnx.com> from "Tony Li" at Nov 18, 96 11:29:24 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Tony, > You're right. Market cap of $36B and they're not important... more > installed machines than FreeBSD and they're not important... Good thing > Microsoft isn't important either... Since the discussion was about how fast UNIX can route packets, Dennis is absolutely right... they are not important because by your own statement, IOS is not UNIX. Neither is Microsoft because I don't recall Microsoft releasing any UNIX variant OS's recently. And I don't particularly care if Gates _did_ try to assimilate UNIX into NT by decree of equivalency :-) NT ain't UNIX. (Actually, I could have sworn that I heard that IOS was developed with a UNIX model in mind (obviously not for the routing parts, but...)) ... JG