From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Feb 26 18:59:37 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id SAA20793 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 26 Feb 1995 18:59:37 -0800
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [198.137.146.49]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA20786; Sun, 26 Feb 1995 18:59:27 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA10673; Sun, 26 Feb 1995 19:57:55 -0700
Message-Id: <199502270257.TAA10673@rover.village.org>
To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD 
Cc: wmbfmk@urc.tue.nl, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, ernie@tinny.eis.net.au,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 26 Feb 1995 13:59:35 MST
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 1995 19:57:54 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

: The argument on standardization between *BSD is that people should be
: able to research in groups.

I've followed this thread.

>From the perspective of a binary only distribution ISV, I'd welcome
binary compatibility between the various flavors of BSD based on the
4.4-Lite distribution.

I know it may be hard, or not.  I feel it to be a desirable goal, but
fear that other more pressing items may take priority.

Warner