From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 14:31:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8FA16A405 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (chuggalug2.demon.co.uk [83.104.169.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E218113C4B9 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.14.0/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l2SE7JCd065248; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:07:19 GMT (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.13.8/8.12.10/Submit) id l2SE7JoH065247; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:07:19 GMT (envelope-from geoffb) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:07:19 +0000 From: Geoff Buckingham To: Szab?? P??ter Message-ID: <20070328140719.GA57134@chuggalug.clues.com> References: <003401c7712a$f71ebb60$6502a8c0@peteruj> <005c01c77134$28e0fce0$6502a8c0@peteruj> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005c01c77134$28e0fce0$6502a8c0@peteruj> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raid3 is slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:31:06 -0000 On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:25:23PM +0200, Szab?? P??ter wrote: > Yes, consumers are the disks. > > # graid3 list > > Geom name: nmivol > State: DEGRADED > Components: 5 > Flags: NONE > GenID: 0 > SyncID: 73 > ID: 2396346217 > Zone64kFailed: 0 > Zone64kRequested: 13987 > Zone16kFailed: 11189 > Zone16kRequested: 28827400 > Zone4kFailed: 71105 > Zone4kRequested: 29207293 I could have be missing something here, but does DEGRADED above not have an impact on performance?