From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 14 09:24:45 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233)
	id CB40A1065674; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:24:45 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:24:45 +0000
From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Message-ID: <20111014092445.GA11785@freebsd.org>
References: <20111014085609.GA3799@freebsd.org>
	<40448.1318582809@critter.freebsd.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40448.1318582809@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Nikolay Denev <ndenev@gmail.com>,
	FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Prepend timestamp in msgbuf
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:24:45 -0000

On Fri Oct 14 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20111014085609.GA3799@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
> 
> >1) would it be possible to prepend those timestamps to the actual console
> >output and not only to the output of demsg? maybe via a sysctl toggle?
> 
> The kernel does not know enough about timezones to emit anything
> but UTC timestamps.

hmm ok.

> 
> >2) my dmesg output contains a lot of these entries: "<118>"
> 
> These are magic markers for syslogd(8) specifying priority.

it would be nice, if their output could be turned off via a dmesg flag imo.

> 
> >3) roughly the first 30 lines of my dmesg output have the timestamp "[1.0]".
> >would it be possible to have more accuracy there?
> 
> No, because we don't know the time until we've found the RTC chip.

maybe prepending the output with [??] instead of [1.0] would make more sense,
so users knows that those timestamps are bogus.

cheers.
alex

> 
> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.