From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 27 13:16:44 2013
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1317)
 id E89762D6; Mon, 27 May 2013 13:16:44 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 13:16:44 +0000
From: William Grzybowski <wg@freebsd.org>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r319229 - head/archivers/libpar2
Message-ID: <20130527131644.GA18741@hub.freebsd.org>
References: <201305271253.r4RCrrox092814@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20130527130618.GN1925@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130527130618.GN1925@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 William Grzybowski <wg@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 13:16:45 -0000

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 03:06:18PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:53:53PM +0000, William Grzybowski wrote:
> > Author: wg
> > Date: Mon May 27 12:53:53 2013
> > New Revision: 319229
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/319229
> > 
> > Log:
> >   - Use gcc for now (does not compile with clang)
> >   
> >   Upstream seems inactive for about 7 years
> >   
> >   PR:		ports/178989
> >   Submitted by:	wg (myself)
> >   Approved by:	culot (mentor)
> > 
> 
> Have you consider the 0.2.1 version before forcing gcc? according to
> debian packages scheme their seem to be a hidden 0.2.1 version hidden somewhere
> :)

I didn't, 0.2 was all I could find in SF.