Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 02:32:25 -0700 From: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r502676 - in head/science: . opensph opensph/files Message-ID: <225414dd-4a41-9645-5004-937419175b66@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20190527091902.GA21784@FreeBSD.org> References: <201905260408.x4Q489Sj016376@repo.freebsd.org> <20190526085728.GA35964@FreeBSD.org> <ca65087e-b8e0-aa02-5c0f-a834d665fd65@freebsd.org> <20190527091902.GA21784@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2019-05-27 02:19, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > There is a consensus WRT PORTNAMEs as well, I'm sure you can easily notice > it and obtain numbers with a simple shell script. That said, please, do > not use mixed cased PORTNAMEs, "distinctive and diverse shape" does not > help it here but only creates needless inconsistency and confusion. This is easy: if you want this rule you should create a patch for the PHB with this rule. Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?225414dd-4a41-9645-5004-937419175b66>