Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:52:49 -0400 From: "Donald J . Maddox" <dmaddox@conterra.com> To: Gary Palmer <gjp@in-addr.com> Cc: dmaddox@conterra.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Message-ID: <19990926135249.A843@dmaddox.conterra.com> In-Reply-To: <64215.938367729@noop.colo.erols.net> References: <19990926132156.B548@dmaddox.conterra.com> <64215.938367729@noop.colo.erols.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sigh. Again, I didn't demand anything. I simply pointed out that functionality had been lost. If I was the author of this code, I would *want* feedback on how it was working out for people out here in userland. I assume that the authors in question _do_ want such feedback. On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 01:42:09PM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote: > "Donald J . Maddox" wrote in message ID > <19990926132156.B548@dmaddox.conterra.com>: > > Ummm... I'm not screaming anything, Gary. The intent of my message is > > just to let the authors of this code know that it is *not* equal in > > functionality to what was removed. As I said in my original message, it > > would be nice to see that functionality restored. > > And how much time/resources are you willing to dedicate to restoration > of functionality *YOU* need? > > > It may very well be that the authors are aware of this, and just don't > > give a damn. I prefer to give them the benefit of the doubt. > > They probably give a damn, but it goes a long way if you HELP them > rather than go around demanding stuff be put back. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990926135249.A843>