From owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org Mon Jun 25 12:31:27 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F93B100D21F for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1AC7AB02 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6663C100D21E; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AEB100D21D for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E78D37AAFE for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3293511F29 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5PCVPew028236 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:31:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5PCVPdB028233 for java@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:31:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229329] java/openjdk8: allow user to trust extra local certificates Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:31:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: 1983-01-06@gmx.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: java@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:31:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229329 --- Comment #3 from Michael Osipov <1983-01-06@gmx.net> --- > The problem is really a general problem with how this is designed in Java= . I am inclined to refuse this suggestion since it would now be compatible = with other OS:es javas. I do not fully agree because other OSes do derive cacerts from Mozilla's pu= blic list. OpenJDK does not yet include a cacerts. BTW, RHEL provides an overly complex option to solve bug 229329. > -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=3D/home/girgen/mycacerts Isn't really an option because I would miss all public CAs. It'd be cat-and-mice-game to chase both which I don't want to do. Moreover, hooking this into each and very possible application is a pain. I'd like to hear Greg Lewis stance on this and since 229329 has not been rejected yet, I'd be fair to keep this one open. I guess I am not the only idiot having this problem. At best 229329 would be resolved and the ports system would derive the caca= rts from the ca_root_nss: https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/ca-certificates-ja= va --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=