From owner-freebsd-java Fri May 25 10:30:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from crewsoft.com (ns.aenet.net [157.22.214.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C347037B422 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:30:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cedric@wireless-networks.com) Received: from [24.142.125.138] (account cberger@wireless-networks.com HELO wireless-networks.com) by crewsoft.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP id 650210; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:33:29 -0700 Message-ID: <3B0E96CA.341C054A@wireless-networks.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 10:30:50 -0700 From: Cedric Berger X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ernst de Haan Cc: "Koster, K.J." , 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' Subject: Re: Who used jdk 1.1.8 and linux 1.2.2? References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FD9C0E@l04.research.kpn.com> <3B0E93D6.3A9B10B6@wireless-networks.com> <20010525191923.A33219@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ernst de Haan wrote: > Cedric. > > According to the laws of version numbering, 1.3.1 *is* a 1.3 version, and so > is 1.3.0. I assume you are stating that 1.3.0 may not be very useful now that > 1.3.1 is out. Your assumption is correct. > Well, I just submitted a diff that will upgrade the java/linux-jdk13 port from > 1.3.0_02 to 1.3.1, but I already found that 1.3.1 exposed one problem that > 1.3.0_02 did not. A newer version is not always better in all situations. Interresting. Is it the focus problem (bug 4199374) mentioned in the release note or something else, FreeBSD-specific? Cedric To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message