From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat May 4 09:14:41 1996 Return-Path: owner-hardware Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA13566 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 4 May 1996 09:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs.rice.edu (cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA13560 for ; Sat, 4 May 1996 09:14:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from noel.cs.rice.edu (noel.cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.136]) by cs.rice.edu (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id LAA25576 for ; Sat, 4 May 1996 11:14:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by noel.cs.rice.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA01487 for ; Sat, 4 May 1996 11:14:37 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199605041614.LAA01487@noel.cs.rice.edu> To: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Intel Pro/100B Date: Sat, 04 May 1996 11:14:35 -0500 From: Alan Cox Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Can someone with the documentation for this card please tell me how to increase the interpacket gap on transmission? In case you're curious, the background is that I'm using several FreeBSD powered machines with the Pro/100B (and some SPARC 20s too) to evaluate a Cisco 1700 and a Cisco 5000 with a 10/100 switching module. Under load, the Cisco 1700 is flashing an LED that among other things indicates babble on the port. With the SPARC 20s driving the network, I don't see this problem. Thanks, Alan