From owner-freebsd-scsi Sat Sep 13 11:03:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA17390 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Sat, 13 Sep 1997 11:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.kcwc.com (h1.kcwc.com [206.139.252.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA17381 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 1997 11:03:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.kcwc.com (NX5.67c/NeXT-2.0-KCWC-1.0) id AA10508; Sat, 13 Sep 97 14:03:39 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 97 14:03:39 -0400 From: curt@kcwc.com (Curt Welch) Message-Id: <9709131803.AA10508@mail.kcwc.com> Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.87.1) Received: by NeXT Mailer (1.87.1) To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smxrgrav) Subject: Re: XP34550S / AHA2940UW refuses wide negotiation Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smxrgrav) wrote: > I recently upgraded my Adaptec 2940 to a 2940UW to take full advantage > of my Quantum Atlas II. However, it seems that both the adapter and > the disk are refusing wide negotiation. > I am using both internal connectors on the SCSI adapter, > with the Atlas on the wide bus and a Conner 1080S and a > Toshiba 3801 on the narrow bus. "Enable wide negotiation" > is set to "Yes" (default) for all devices in the 2940UW > BIOS setup. Relevant information from dmesg follows: > FreeBSD 2.2.1-RELEASE #0: Sun Aug 10 17:01:55 CEST 1997 > [...] > ahc0 rev 0 int a irq 9 on pci0:10 > ahc0: aic7880 Wide Channel, SCSI Id=7, 16 SCBs > ahc0:A:0: refuses WIDE negotiation. Using 8bit transfers > (ahc0:0:0): "CONNER CFP1080S 4649" type 0 fixed SCSI 2 > sd0(ahc0:0:0): Direct-Access 1030MB (2110812 512 byte sectors) > (ahc0:2:0): "QUANTUM XP34550W LXY1" type 0 fixed SCSI 2 > sd1(ahc0:2:0): Direct-Access 4341MB (8890760 512 byte sectors) > ahc0:A:5: refuses WIDE negotiation. Using 8bit transfers > (ahc0:5:0): "TOSHIBA CD-ROM XM-3801TA 1047" type 5 removable SCSI 2 > cd0(ahc0:5:0): CD-ROM can't get the size It looks to me like the Quantum is working fine. It's the Conner and the CD-ROM that are refusing WIDE negotation. I think you just got confused by the order in which the messages come out. Note the device numbers. > Is it caused by using narrow and wide devices on the same adapter? No, that works fine. I do it also. > Why is the Atlas II reported as a SCSI 2 device rather than SCSI 3? Don't know but that's how it works. I think wide and maybe even ultra speed devices are part of the SCSI 2 spec. People have just come to call wide SCSI-3 even though it isn't. Don't know if the dirve is SCSI-3 or not. Maybe some of the SCSI experts on this list can give us a lesson. Curt