From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 11 09:11:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA08450 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 09:11:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from janus.syracuse.net (janus.syracuse.net [205.232.47.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA08438 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 09:10:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@unixhelp.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by janus.syracuse.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA24182; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:09:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:09:33 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Feldman X-Sender: green@janus.syracuse.net To: Andrzej Bialecki cc: Pascal Hofstee , Shawn Ramsey , oZZ!!! , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: StarOffice-5.0... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Yes, I've got the diffs against relatively fresh current. BTW, I asked > this question on -emulation, but got back a profound silence... Can we/ > should we incorporate this patch, and hide it under a kernel option, say > PROCFS_CMDLINE? The life would be soooo easier for people new to our linux > emulation... > > Andrzej Bialecki > Send it here! I need to get StarOffice 5 working as much as possible, so I may continue LinuxThreads work with a Real Program. Cheers, Brian Feldman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message