From owner-freebsd-isp  Wed Feb 26 09:35:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA21010
          for isp-outgoing; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:35:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zwei.siemens.at (zwei.siemens.at [193.81.246.12])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA21004;
          Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sol1.gud.siemens.co.at (root@[10.1.143.100]) by zwei.siemens.at (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA20059; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:36:41 +0100 (MET)
Received: from ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at by sol1.gud.siemens.co.at with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #7 for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>) 
	id m0vznFP-0001zDC; Wed, 26 Feb 97 18:34 MET
Received: by ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at (1.37.109.16/1.37)
	id AA177658232; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:30:32 +0100
From: "Hr.Ladavac" <lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at>
Message-Id: <199702261730.AA177658232@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at>
Subject: Re: [H] Optimal computer for FreeBSD
To: lada@ws2313.gud.siemens.co.at (Hr.Ladavac)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:30:32 +0100 (MEZ)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at, vince@mail.MCESTATE.COM,
        michaelv@MindBender.serv.net, tom@sdf.com, sergey@extech.msk.su,
        freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199702261726.AA177037988@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at> from "Hr.Ladavac" at Feb 26, 97 06:26:28 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

E-mail message from Hr.Ladavac contained:
> E-mail message from Terry Lambert contained:
> > > With the slight exception of PPro processors where both L1 and L2 caches
> > > reside in the same package, albeit on two separate pieces of sillicon...
> > 
> > What a neat idea.  Then if you want a larger L2, I can make you
> > buy a whole new processor.
> 
> And charge you double: after all, you're getting twice as many
> transistors in the cache...

My brain fart: you should consider it a bargain, since you're getting
at least *four* time as many transistors (the cache is static, idiot :)

/Marino
> 
> /Marino
> > 
> > 8-|
> > 
> > 
> > 					Terry Lambert
> > 					terry@lambert.org
> > ---
> > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
> > or previous employers.
> > 
>