From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Oct 17 13:19:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA26745
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 13:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA26726
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 13:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id PAA01378; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 15:16:51 -0500
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Message-Id: <199610172016.PAA01378@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Subject: Re: IP bugs in FreeBSD 2.1.5
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 15:16:51 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199610171855.LAA06293@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Oct 17, 96 11:55:26 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> And that therefore in any population of diverging sets, we can expect
> to see an expotential increase in the amount of divergence over time?

Sounds like Linux to me!!

> Why do you think I disagree so loudly, yet don't go off and form
> "TerryBSD", where I can run the same show by the same rules until
> the inherenet structural limits force "TerryBSD" to fragment as well?

It won't .. because it's TerryBSD.

> Hint: Societies are subject to statistical laws, and I'm not stupid.

:-)

... JG