Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 13:08:54 -0400 From: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@glue.umd.edu> To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GLUT w/o Mesa? Message-ID: <39354726.C8DEEFDD@glue.umd.edu> References: <39352C97.267E71AA@glue.umd.edu> <20000531130216.I22499@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will Andrews wrote: > > On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 11:15:35AM -0400, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > > Didn't find this in the archives. What happened to sorting by date? I > > really miss that. > > > > Now that XFree 4 comes with Mesa builtin, how does one install GLUT w/o > > installing the Mesa port (thereby overwriting the builtin files)? Yes, I > > know I could hack the port, but it seems that there should be either a > > separate GLUT port or an ONLY_GLUT switch on the current Mesa port. Am I > > the only one with this problem? > > This is an XFree86 problem. Those stupid !@%!@ (don't get me started) > need to remove GL includes from their distribution. GL belongs > separate, pure and simple. > > You are SOL until they do this, sorry.. (I'm sticking with 3.3.6 until > they get their stuff straight). Will there be any problem with installing Mesa over the XFree stuff? The way I understood it was that the included libs were needed to support the DRI stuff. Does the Mesa port handle this? -Brandon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39354726.C8DEEFDD>