From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 18 21:53:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA25360 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 21:53:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from bb.cc.wa.us (root@aries.bb.cc.wa.us [134.39.181.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA25352 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 21:53:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@bb.cc.wa.us) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by bb.cc.wa.us (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA23074; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 21:52:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 21:52:19 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Coleman To: Terry Lambert cc: Nate Williams , daniel_sobral@voga.com.br, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why so many steps to build new kernel? In-Reply-To: <199712180317.UAA07959@usr07.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > Heck, I've got 10-20 people willing to be added to the 'FS-101' list by How may people would we need to round up before you would be willing to "block out a large chunk of time" and do an 'FS-101'. I am sure I have a handful of people over here. (me included) :-). Do I need to do a roll call ? ;-) > > I have to actually block out a large chunk of time to be able to do > this in a way that isn't half-assed. I'm a bit cautious here as well: > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. > Christopher J. Coleman (chris@bb.cc.wa.us) Computer Support Analyst I (509)-766-8873 FreeBSD Book Project: http://www.vmunix.com/fbsd-book/ On Thu, 18 Dec 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: