From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 21 18:14:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A80CE4 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 18:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3604220C0 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 18:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s4LIECB4004997 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 May 2014 12:14:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s4LIECWf004994; Wed, 21 May 2014 12:14:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:14:12 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Lucius Rizzo Subject: Re: What is your favourite/best firewall on FreeBSD and why? In-Reply-To: <20140520070926.GA92183@The.ie> Message-ID: References: <20140520070926.GA92183@The.ie> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 21 May 2014 12:14:12 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:14:14 -0000 On Tue, 20 May 2014, Lucius Rizzo wrote: > Ultimately, outside configuration differences all firewalls are essentially > serve the same purpose but I wonder what is your favorite and why? If > you were to run FreeBSD in production, which of the three would you > choose? IPFilter, PF or IPFW? I started with IPFW and used it a long time. Then I switched to PF, which has been easier to configure. Certainly PF is what I would use for any new projects.