From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 04:24:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F2216A41B for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1710013C442 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 15651 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2007 04:24:25 -0000 Received: from adsl221.dyn112.pacific.net.sg (HELO P2120.somewherefaraway.com) (oceanare@210.24.112.221) by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTPA; 28 Dec 2007 04:24:25 -0000 Message-ID: <47747A72.3070109@pacific.net.sg> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:24:18 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070826) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Nicole References: <26ddd1750712271246j14795cf3wf8e9727f0f7cc148@mail.gmail.com> <47746AFA.5080008@pacific.net.sg> <200712280327.lBS3RQi2021404@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200712280327.lBS3RQi2021404@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mkhitrov@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking undesirable domains using BIND X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:24:28 -0000 Hi, Olivier Nicole wrote: >> Has bind a visible advantage in the response time? > > Maybe not in response time, but certainly in centralisation: you only > maintain one DNS instead of every machine. > this is obvious to me too. I would not like to use bind for filtering except in larger organisations. Erich