From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 26 15:32:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47857E3 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D923BF1 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3B23933C52; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:32:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: weldon@excelsusphoto.com Subject: Re: No BASH shellshock thread yet? References: Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:32:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: (weldon@excelsusphoto.com's message of "Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:42:29 -0500") Message-ID: <44a95mfld1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:32:49 -0000 weldon@excelsusphoto.com writes: > Does the current patch actually fix it fully? Yes, the port fixes it fully.