Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 18:21:37 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu, Stefan Esser <se@ZPR.Uni-Koeln.DE> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1 Message-ID: <gl1-eUmWjY@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <199510100936.AA11170@Sysiphos>; from Stefan Esser at Tue, 10 Oct 1995 10:36:55 %2B0100 References: <199510100936.AA11170@Sysiphos>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199510100936.AA11170@Sysiphos> Stefan Esser writes: >On Oct 10, 1:03, Satoshi Asami wrote: >} Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1 >} (Sorry for crosspost -- replies to ports only) >} >} Well, so what do you guys think about updating the "port"? (I know, >} it's a binary-only port and we can't distribute the distfile/package >} anyway....) I've been using it since yesterday, and it feels really >} "beta", so I won't update the port unless people really want the >} change to go in. I dislike this idea, it contains too many bugs for everyday usage comparing to old version. BTW, I think separate port (netscape2) will be nice addition. -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gl1-eUmWjY>