Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:00:44 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> To: Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Giulio Ferro <auryn@zirakzigil.org>, Nate Eldredge <nate@thatsmathematics.com> Subject: Re: ZFS group ownership Message-ID: <20090916130044.GA2670@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <78cb3d3f0909160336m2d1f93dsad4aafb692395a80@mail.gmail.com> References: <4AAB8AD0.5010302@zirakzigil.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0909151507080.8152@zeno.ucsd.edu> <78cb3d3f0909160336m2d1f93dsad4aafb692395a80@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:36:57PM +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote: > Which of the following would then be the best option (also taking POLA > into account): > * leave things are they are > * make ZFS under FreeBSD behave the way open(2) describes > * have a new ZFS property govern the behavior and default to one of the above Btw, on Linux all the common filesystem support the SysV behaviour by default but have a mount option bsdgroups/grpid that turns on the BSD hebaviour. I would recommend you do the same just with reversed signs on FreeBSD. ??Having different default behaviour for different filesystems on a single OS is generally a bad idea.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090916130044.GA2670>