From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Thu Mar 25 16:55:15 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CFC5C434B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:55:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F5rnZ05zqz3sLN for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (news@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1lPTGC-00H2a6-Ph; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:55:04 +0100 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 12PGofHG023348 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:50:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 12PGofMY023347 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:50:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: list.freebsd.hackers Subject: Re: Wireguard Controversy Statement Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:50:41 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F5rnZ05zqz3sLN X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of news@mips.inka.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c) smtp.mailfrom=news@mips.inka.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.21 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[news]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[inka.de]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.992]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.987]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:202113, ipnet:2a04:c9c7::/32, country:DE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:55:15 -0000 On 2021-03-22, Warner Losh wrote: > Core unconditionally values the work of all contributors, and seeks a > culture of cooperation, respect, and collaboration. The public discourse > over WireGuard in the past week does not meet these standards and is > damaging to our community if not checked. As such, WireGuard development > for FreeBSD will now proceed outside of the base system. For those who wish > to evaluate, test, or experiment with WireGuard, snapshots will be > available via the ports and package systems. At face value this seems to say that WireGuard is now permanently banned from inclusion in the base system. Or maybe the intent is that development for WireGuard on FreeBSD will continue outside of the base system until it has reached sufficient maturity to be included again? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de