From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Mon Jan 27 08:34:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F8523708C; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485jhc3LmBz470m; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (etoilebsd.net [178.32.217.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54EDFEC26; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5F520BFC77; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:34:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:34:06 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: "Tobias C. Berner" , Jan Beich , ports-committers , svn-ports-all , svn-ports-head , gecko@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r524241 - head/databases/sqlite3 Message-ID: <20200127083406.5k6npmcepxqyppov@ivaldir.net> References: <202001270533.00R5XDkT049821@repo.freebsd.org> <20200127062504.GA47080@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r7s2ki5odixbfwel" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200127062504.GA47080@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:34:08 -0000 --r7s2ki5odixbfwel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 06:25:04AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 07:19:00AM +0100, Tobias C. Berner wrote: > > There is talk upstream of no longer supporting system sqlite in the > > future. >=20 > But that goes against encouraged practices (to avoid bundled libraries), > what's their rationale for going the wrong way? >=20 The sqlite library is designed to be bundle, many feature are to be activat= ed at build time (FTS for example, but not only) which may have an impact on m= any things. So sqlite is very peculiar, if upstream is using only common part of sqlite= then it is fine to build unbundled, otherwise it is better to bundle it (for this one.) Best regards, Bapt --r7s2ki5odixbfwel Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAl4uoHsACgkQY4mL3PG3 PlpQQhAAnPFeKDZs3fqGkl/QF937J5ZI2yn5JqLKYCbEjBsZRMApvy9zY1tb2xYi EhNE50LrKhqIdeMD4n9lPm9FTEvjMgowJHaBF2Lb/5tzd1WQd2hm6qfmbUiG5pAH IC91UoeKhobkZBdMcLY8HenX/fa94xMGiUdz63i933yVLKgGdg5eIwT6pV0//wT0 z9clqQeZ6syKjlMnmMJTCoLKD907mDMDKkKEqBeUgqrMNiPP64udVC5DE91l6crG dmp41SUyQGS/qbqZ0ZKbSWikTxzoOU3kQKXNbMDpAbEEZSvRy69iDEE73LuDUa2V rsxAhxkUfAIUUOwIoBrr0yhvBXBzHt4et+XPcGdLL5BA62HJcz2jljSY673aB1Sn j5hnQs6dqV86e2Bd4B+VDdASEJv7omVGQ+cITrhGJvVejG40WwLBhwZoJ53qY0Yt xy2L9a599yAXvYDx1wOThkSXanivt5MS3scH7STos0z3wYl3HOLkhS+uSBKdulC5 TsczNcT8ibjLbUGK0A5itCWYii2t1lCotjEVi2dXM5+Fnb5CZ+PjMYXjUJrimUJd lEwotRljvkvwcmovq8PwBxG7fTMuc06c0/yIXri00hv6gUpAAQEEUz8XgIu55saC eps4x/TN5Z5dTPUSD160QPbDTF68aPjjCpbaTwItKl4Glqw2Y2U= =nQDl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r7s2ki5odixbfwel--