From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 19:34:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB2C16A41F for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:34:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC3643DDA for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:33:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.76.67]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051021193330.LHXQ16334.mta10.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:33:30 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF3CEB59E; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:33:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:33:39 -0400 From: Parv To: Benjamin Lutz Message-ID: <20051021193339.GA14427@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Benjamin Lutz , nocturnal , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4357D830.7060506@swehack.se> <435825F8.4020305@datacomm.ch> <20051021002031.GA12167@holestein.holy.cow> <43583699.9050308@datacomm.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43583699.9050308@datacomm.ch> Cc: nocturnal , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flaws in the ports system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:34:20 -0000 in message <43583699.9050308@datacomm.ch>, wrote Benjamin Lutz thusly... > > Parv wrote: > > It seems anybody who does not like "make search" and is able to > > generate an alternative, does. I did. And so did[0] Matthew > > Seaman by having sysutils/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex in the ports > > system. > > Heh, seems so. But then it's very easy to do so with the INDEX > file already existing and being easily parseable, and writing such > a tool is a fun (and rewarding) programming exercise. Indeed. > I guess what's missing is an all-powerful search tool. I have some > ideas, maybe around christmas I find some time to write something. Can you give us a glimpse of what else is it that you think is missing for Dec 25 is more than 2 months away? - Parv --