Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 10:25:00 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Cc: terry@lambert.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation, gethostid() Message-ID: <199610241725.KAA12236@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199610240215.LAA04187@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Oct 24, 96 11:45:15 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Do we want an ioctl to get the hardware address? If not, any > > > suggestions on a _tidy_ way to get it? > > > > Check the list archives. The Mathematica "correct method" included > > patches to implement the interface without the kernel grubbing. I > > am suprised that the patches were not integrated. > > You mean this one? I'm not surprised : [ ... grungy patch deleted ... ] > No other messages on the subject appear to contain any code at all, but > I'll pester Andrew Gallatin and see if he finished the issue. Crap. I didn't save the patch reference. It was a url for the patch, not the patch itself; sorry, I don't have more information, not having saved it. 8-(. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610241725.KAA12236>