From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 18 21:37:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CA516A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 21:37:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B2B43D3F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 21:37:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from lonesome.lonesome.com (cs242719-195.austin.rr.com
	[24.27.19.195])	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 29128146FA; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:37:11 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Organization: Lonesome Dove Computing Services
To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru>,
	David Raistrick <drais@atlasta.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:36:17 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <Pine.BSF.4.50L0.0401181145300.22604-100000@fryit.atlasta.net>
	<20040119052652.GA45134@regency.nsu.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040119052652.GA45134@regency.nsu.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401182336.17291.linimon@lonesome.com>
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: WMxmms, NOT broken..?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 05:37:12 -0000

On Sunday 18 January 2004 11:26 pm, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 11:48:28AM -0800, David Raistrick wrote:
> > I had no problem (re)compliling this port in my 4.9-RELEASE machine
>
> the build breaks on bento, but no one who i know were able to
> reproduce it in any live environment (either -current or > -stable).
> maybe were just not trying hard enough..

One way to reproduce the bento environment is to attempt to build
the port in a jailed environment with no ports installed.  That's what
I would recommend.  That will expose any, e.g., missed dependencies.

mcl