From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 14 17:14:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8EA16A4CE for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 17:14:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5334843D4C for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 17:14:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i7EHEj27010175; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:14:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Jeremy Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AKmZNk6dkYaR5d27b+An" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1092503694.36842.5.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:14:54 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading -CURRENT and will downgrade GNOME to 2.6... X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 17:14:58 -0000 --=-AKmZNk6dkYaR5d27b+An Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 13:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Right now, I am working on the upgrading the -CURRENT (the buildworld jus= t =20 > started) and I am planning to delete all apps, then install GNOME 2.6 to = =20 > allow me to do the test better while I am going to work on the =20 > ruby-gtk2/gnome2 update to 0.10.0. Please install from packages from the Tinderbox. They are up-to-date with GNOME 2.6 minus the glib20 and gtk20 updates from yesterday. >=20 > When I am done with the ruby-gtk2/gnome2 update, then do you want me to =20 > test with gnome_upgrade.sh for GNOME 2.6 -> 2.7.x? Unless, it's already =20 > well tested by adamw and/or whomever. If nobody reply on this part, then = I =20 > will do the 'rm -rf /usr/local/* /usr/X11R6/* /compat/linux/* =20 > /var/db/pkg/*' and do the clean install instead gnome_upgrade.sh, because= =20 > it is faster than portupgrade when do the big upgrade. I think a gnome_upgrade.sh would be a good idea. I would also ask you do this with packages just to see if there are any gotchas. You should be able to manipulate PORTUPGRADE_ARGS to get this to happen via packages. It might be nice to have some documentation for users when 2.8 comes out. Note: the 2.7 packages are lagging a bit since I'm waiting for 2.7.90 to be officially announced. Thanks! Joe >=20 > Cheers, > Mezz --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-AKmZNk6dkYaR5d27b+An Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBHkiOb2iPiv4Uz4cRAuU1AJ46yWHWfMFXlC7AEp+OZYf5zp6NygCeImB7 RoueYxibU8Wv22JzbOa0/+A= =jwew -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AKmZNk6dkYaR5d27b+An--