From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Mar 2 13:21:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA03625 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:21:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA03620 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:21:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from henrich@localhost) by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.4) id QAA10831; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 16:21:29 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Henrich Message-Id: <199703022121.QAA10831@crh.cl.msu.edu> Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 16:21:29 -0500 (EST) Cc: jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, ejs@bfd.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199703022102.NAA06453@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Mar 2, 97 01:02:49 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Cool! > > I got hold of a 2.1 machine and recompiled the binary > this is what I am getting: > > {hasty} ./client -m > rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts > rc5-56-client: Complete in 2.614 seconds. (382627.93 keys/sec) > {hasty} ./client -m > rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts > rc5-56-client: Complete in 2.566 seconds. (389699.01 keys/sec) > {hasty} > > Now a client compiled on my 3.0 box: > > {hasty} ./client -m > rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts > rc5-56-client: Complete in 4.449 seconds. (224788.41 keys/sec) You need to now update your stats on vex :) What IS vex anyway? And how did it become associated with us FreeBSD folk? -Crh Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich