From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 13 21:01:00 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8E537B401
	for <cvs-src@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 21:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2F4A43FA3
	for <cvs-src@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 21:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 15728 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jul 2003 04:01:01 -0000
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 21:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030714024221.DD3A937B441@hub.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20030713210028.E15586@root.org>
References: <20030714024221.DD3A937B441@hub.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica/Osd OsdMemory.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 04:01:01 -0000

On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>   Modified files:
>     sys/dev/acpica/Osd   OsdMemory.c
>   Log:
>   Fix build breakage on ia64. The second argument of AcpiOsReadable()
>   and AcpiOsWritable() have type ACPI_SIZE and not UINT32.
>
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.10      +2 -2      src/sys/dev/acpica/Osd/OsdMemory.c

Thanks.  I take it the differences between ia32 and ia64 caused this to
not generate a warning?

-Nate