Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:59:49 +0100 From: Artur =?utf-8?q?Ba=C4=87?= <artur@ebasoft.com.pl> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need info about ACPI - implementing, done .... Message-ID: <200801310159.49389.artur@ebasoft.com.pl> In-Reply-To: <47A11ACD.8000409@root.org> References: <200801261837.26708.artur@ebasoft.com.pl> <47A073F1.2020701@ebasoft.com.pl> <47A11ACD.8000409@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thursday 31 of January 2008 01:48:13 napisa=C5=82e=C5=9B(-=C5=82a=C5=9B): > This is a bit off-topic. However, I think the combination of an Bit of topic, but when we take into consideration of 'pnp0c14' solution=20 hiden arguments in some wacpi.sys driver for wmi method in acpi. No responce for my gentle asks for bios,wmi info from fujitsu siemens ... > over-complicated spec and the secrecy/anonymity of OEMs is the real > enabler of acpi problems. You do know that some small shop in Taiwan Dosn't matter if there are problems, but does matter if some gay makes=20 specially such design and decides whitout me how i will be able to use=20 hardware that I OWNS , i payed.=20 > actually defined and built your BIOS, not Phoenix or AMI, right? It dosn't matter for me who in real build my bios hoever this could explain= =20 why there is no answer from fujitsu-siemens:) But does matter that there is no portable solution for such cases like my=20 which could be used in FreeBSD to solve problems of many users not few like= =20 my and Mikael. =2D-=20 Artur
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200801310159.49389.artur>