From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Mar 30 12:42:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from ns1x.pvt.net (ns.pvt.net [194.149.105.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11BD37B6A8 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:42:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from milon.papezik@oskarmobil.cz) Received: from oskarmobil.cz (nat.ceskymobil.cz [194.149.122.193]) by ns1x.pvt.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA07841 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:42:23 +0200 Message-ID: <38E3BB8D.C8338385@oskarmobil.cz> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:39:41 +0200 From: Milon Papezik X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: mutex and reader/writer locks Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, when speaking about locks, interrupt threads etc... I found very interresting reading in "Sun World" magazine and it seems they did a lot of measring, code clean up and tuning between Solaris releases 2.5.1/2.6/2.7. The most interresting columns are at: http://www.sunworld.com/sunworldonline/swol-09-1999/swol-09-insidesolaris.html http://www.sunworld.com/sunworldonline/swol-10-1999/swol-10-insidesolaris.html I think we can learn here a bit ;-) What is current consensus about our approach to "move to kernel/interrupt threads" development in FreeBSD? What synchronization primitives are we using now? What synchronization primitives are we going to use? Milon -- milon.papezik@oskarmobil.cz To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message