From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 23:16:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B9016A4CE; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:16:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE70543D48; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:16:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (12-216-243-9.client.mchsi.com[12.216.243.9]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with ESMTP id <20041209231636m91000dutje>; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:16:36 +0000 Message-ID: <41B8DCD3.1080009@math.missouri.edu> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:16:35 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041205 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org, maho@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: distfile for lang/ifc X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 23:16:37 -0000 I would like to use the Intel Fortran Compiler that is installed by the lang/ifc port. I followed the downloading instructions that come as a result of "make fetch" but Intel sent me l_fc_p_8.1.018.tar.gz, but the port requires l_fc_pc_8.0.046.tar.gz and l_fc_pc_8.0.046_pe050.1.tar.gz. So here are my questions: 1. Is it likely that lang/ifc will be updated soon? 2. Or is it possible to get hold of l_fc_pc_8.0.046.tar.gz and l_fc_pc_8.0.046_pe050.1.tar.gz from somewhere, and if so, will the non-commercial license that Intel sent me still work on this older version? 3. Or if I were to try to update the port myself, would a simple substitution of distfiles and a few other things in the Makefile do the job? I did a search on the mailing list of ports, and I saw some kind of discussion - maybe lseek doesn't work quite right or something. But my applications will be doing numerical calculations, and so if an lseek here or there doesn't work quite right, I can live with this. Anyway, all this discussion seemed to take place in April or May, and I wonder if people are still thinking about it? Thanks, Stephen P.S. The lang/icc port seems to work great, and for computationally intensive calculations seems to be faster than the gcc that comes with FreeBSD 5.3.