From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Oct 11 21:30:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80361573D for ; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 21:30:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whiste.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA24995; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 21:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 21:26:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: TrouBle Cc: Brian Reichert , "Ryan Thompson [FreeBSD]" , James Wyatt , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Chroot and ~/bin, ~/etc. Better way? In-Reply-To: <3802C1DE.196F143F@hackfurby.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I ask because that's a problem in a DEVFS world. thousands of users would mean thousands of mounted minimal devfs filesystems. The vfs code assumes that there a re not a lot of filesystems as it tends to keep them in a simple linked list. I'm not sure I'd like to see it.. however I have another Idea that may work as well, or, in conjunction with devfs... hmm I'll have to discuss it with PHK et al. Julian On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, TrouBle wrote: > you only need a dev for each user if you are going to be using thing > that need tty/pty... my system has a small dev for each user > > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > The BIG question I want to know is does he have a /dev/ for each user? > > > > julian > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message