From owner-cvs-all Tue Sep 10 0:51:46 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984E237B400; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 00:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D461F43E42; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 00:51:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsdmail@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (bsdmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g8A7pJkZ047313; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 03:51:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bsdmail@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: (from bsdmail@localhost) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g8A7pJFs047312; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 03:51:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bsdmail) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 03:51:19 -0400 From: "AlanE@FreeBSD.org" To: Dirk Meyer Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/objprelink Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/devel/objprelink/files patch-binutils::libiberty::Makefile.in patch-configure patch-objprelink.c Message-ID: <20020910075119.GA47225@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Reply-To: alane@geeksrus.net References: <200209100631.g8A6VpVt019642@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200209100631.g8A6VpVt019642@freefall.freebsd.org> X-message-flag: Magic 8-Ball says "Outlook not so good." I'll ask it about Exchange next. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:31:51PM -0700, Dirk Meyer wrote: >dinoex 2002/09/09 23:31:51 PDT > > Added files: > devel/objprelink Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr > pkg-plist > devel/objprelink/files patch-binutils::libiberty::Makefile.in > patch-configure patch-objprelink.c > Log: > undo delete port > > Revision Changes Path > 1.11 +60 -0 ports/devel/objprelink/Makefile (new) > 1.3 +2 -0 ports/devel/objprelink/distinfo (new) > 1.3 +7 -0 ports/devel/objprelink/files/patch-binutils::libiberty::Makefile.in (new) > 1.3 +11 -0 ports/devel/objprelink/files/patch-configure (new) > 1.3 +19 -0 ports/devel/objprelink/files/patch-objprelink.c (new) > 1.3 +1 -0 ports/devel/objprelink/pkg-comment (new) > 1.5 +8 -0 ports/devel/objprelink/pkg-descr (new) > 1.3 +1 -0 ports/devel/objprelink/pkg-plist (new) This delete was specifically requested by maintainer. Why did you undo it? It is only used by kde2 AFAIK. Please give me a good reason or else I'm going to back out your backout. -- Alan Eldridge Unix/IT Pro, 20+ yrs, seeking new employment. (http://wwweasel.geeksrus.net/~alane/resume.txt) KDE, KDE-FreeBSD Teams (http://www.kde.org, http://freebsd.kde.org/) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message