From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 4 11:41:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA20734 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 11:41:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp02.primenet.com (smtp02.primenet.com [206.165.6.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA20726 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 11:41:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert@usr07.primenet.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp02.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA09245; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 12:40:57 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr07.primenet.com(206.165.6.207) via SMTP by smtp02.primenet.com, id smtpd009216; Wed Nov 4 12:40:55 1998 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr07.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA12697; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 12:40:49 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199811041940.MAA12697@usr07.primenet.com> Subject: Re: lisp vs. Forth (was Re: New boot loader and alternate kernels ) To: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 19:40:49 +0000 (GMT) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, mike@smith.net.au, parag@cgt.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199811032319.PAA00900@dingo.cdrom.com> from "Mike Smith" at Nov 3, 98 03:19:27 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > What's the feeling on the lisp vs. Forth argument? If the FORTH Interpreter were OpenBoot syntax compliant, we could use it to interpret ROM code on a number of cards designed to be usable in both Intel and PPC systems. Also, there's the whole OpenFirmware standard thing... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message