Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:00:09 +0100
From:      Vincent Hoffman <vince@unsane.co.uk>
To:        Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org>
Cc:        "FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org" <FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: anyone here use poudriere ?
Message-ID:  <50004609.4030705@unsane.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20120713170418.64c53304@davenulle.org>
References:  <50000760.5060904@unsane.co.uk> <20120713170418.64c53304@davenulle.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13/07/2012 16:04, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:32:48 +0100,
> Vincent Hoffman <vince@unsane.co.uk> a écrit :
>
>> I've been playing with poudriere and pkg as per
>> http://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/doc/trunk/doc/pkgng_repos.wiki
>> in the hope that it will be an easier way to maintain a custom
>> internal package repository for work not I'va managed to get a few
>> FreeBSD boxes into service there.
>>
>> I'm liking it lots more than the traditional package build but I am
>> having some problems working out how to set custom build options for
>> ports. Does anyone else use poudriere for this and if so how do they
>> handle this.
> You can copy options into your jail (see man poudriere).
>
> But I agree there is a lack of an interactive mode into poudriere. When
> I install a new port, I don't know which options are available and I
> would like to choose them once time.
/FACEPALM
I could swear I read the man page properly, obviously not.
Thank you

Vince
> Regards.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50004609.4030705>