From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 25 10:56:05 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA03999 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 10:56:05 -0700 Received: from wc.cdrom.com (wc.cdrom.com [192.216.223.37]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA03993 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 10:56:04 -0700 Received: (from seidl@localhost) by wc.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA01062 ; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 10:56:10 -0700 From: "Matthew L. Seidl" Message-Id: <199504251756.KAA01062@wc.cdrom.com> Subject: Re: Mislabeled FreeBSD 2.0 CD's To: Pat_Barron@transarc.com Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 10:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Pat_Barron@transarc.com" at Apr 25, 95 00:35:24 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 980 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Pat_Barron@transarc.com Wrote: > Just came back from Trenton Computer Fair, where someone had a table > set up with CD-ROMs and was selling (among other things) FreeBSD 2.0 > CDs, cheap (like, $16.00). But these were labelled all over the cover > art and CD label with a release date of "January 1994". Shouldn't > this say "January *1995*"? They also had the Walnut Creek logo on the > label. Anyone know what gives? > > I picked one up, and haven't looked at any of the files or anything > yet, but I'm not real sure if I should trust the contents or not.... > Anything listed as FreeBSD 2.0 is Jan 1995. There was a screwup at the printer with the very first batch of labels. -=- Matthew L. Seidl email: seidl@cdrom.com =-= =-= Walnut Creek CDROM Sys Admin Project . . . What Project? -=- -=- Gamer, Re-Enactor, Student We're here to make your life better!=-= =-= And desperately waiting to hear from grad schools -Morrow Quotes -=-