From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Dec 16 10:00:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA18123 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:00:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kerouac.deepwell.com (deepwell.com [209.63.174.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA18116 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:00:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@deepwell.com) Received: (qmail 19524 invoked from network); 16 Dec 1998 18:27:50 -0000 Received: from terry.dcomm.net (HELO terry) (209.63.174.33) by deepwell.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 1998 18:27:50 -0000 Message-Id: <4.1.19981216100101.00c66af0@mail1.dcomm.net> X-Sender: freebsd@mail.deepwell.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:01:20 -0800 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: Deepwell Internet Subject: Re: Aliased IPs Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 04:52 PM 12/16/98 +0100, you wrote: >> As our web hosting business grows, I'm finding myself aliasing more and >> more IP addresses to accomodate. FreeBSD and apache are holding up like >> champs, but my local routing tables are getting a little big. > >Why do you need one IP address per website? You can use Apache's ability >to distinguish between different virtual hosts based on the server name >passed by almost all browsers currently in use. ALMOST being the defining factor. We find that webhosting covers a whole range of people. While we get a whole range of webhost accounts the majority are small businesses operated by people with very little or no knowledge of computers or the internet. I do everything I can to make their sites work 100% of the time for ALL customers. This means if someone hits the site with some goofy browser that doesn't pass the sitename to the server, it should still function. We have a ton of open IP's. Because of this I just assign a separate IP to each site. We'll be starting on our third class-C soon and I don't see a problem continuing this way. Why do you need to run OSPF? Is your webserver on the same ethernet segment as your dialup traffic? As far as the webserver goes, just make a static route for the whole /24 and let it go. Are there people running full production webserver off of one IP address? Have you had any problems? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message