From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 06:48:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22AC16A4CE; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:48:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (VARK.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC5843D55; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:48:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0E6m6xW010894; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:48:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0E6m6hA010893; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:48:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:48:06 -0500 From: David Schultz To: Tim Kientzle Message-ID: <20050114064806.GA10856@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: Tim Kientzle , Pawel Jakub Dawidek , "'freebsd-current@freebsd.org'" References: <200501120735.j0C7ZABq048856@repoman.freebsd.org> <41E5ED66.4070902@freebsd.org> <20050113072153.GA28485@VARK.MIT.EDU> <41E716F3.20504@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41E716F3.20504@freebsd.org> cc: "'freebsd-current@freebsd.org'" cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: fts improvements, alternatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:48:04 -0000 On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Tim Kientzle wrote: > [Moved to -current for further discussion.] > > David Schultz wrote: > >Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > >> > >>>Introduce new field 'fts_bignum' ... > >>>This work is part of the BigDisk project: > >>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/projects/bigdisk/ > >> > >>Any plans to deal with other fts limits ... ? > > > >Removing FTS_LOGICAL's path length limitation is nontrivial, but > >given your experience with bsdtar, I'd say you're an ideal person > >to do it. ;-) > > As it happens, I started tinkering with these ideas a > while ago but haven't found time to finish it all. > > Here's a snapshot of the current WIP: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kientzle/libarchive/src/tree.tgz Nice. That's much cleaner than the fts implementation (although it doesn't do all that fts does.) So tell me again: when did you say were you planning on rewriting/fixing fts? ;-)