From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 19 17:55:19 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0DE16A4CF
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:55:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB5C43D31
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:55:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Received: from ppp9-171.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([81.195.9.171] helo=ciam.ru)
	by mail.ciam.ru with asmtp (Exim 4.x)
	id 1Bbk3U-00038F-Ug; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 21:55:05 +0400
Message-ID: <40D47E01.3080204@ciam.ru>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 21:55:13 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
References: <20040619122336.GA72313@comp.chem.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <20040619122336.GA72313@comp.chem.msu.su>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: PORTDOCS in the Porter's Handbook
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:55:19 -0000

Yar Tikhiy wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> The neat PORTDOCS variable deserves more attention in
> the Porter's Handbook, doesn't it?
> 
> Hope I got it right...  Could anybody review the below
> patch?  Thank you!
> 

Don't forget to send-pr it.

Just one remark:

> +
> +	<para>Recently a new feature was introduced to the ports framework
> +	 in order to facilitate registering port documentation.  Instead of

I think the Porter's Handbook is not a diary and words like 'recently' 
and 'a new feature' are not correct here. The text may be there for years.

-- 
Sem.