From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 16 19:50:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C5416A4CE; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:50:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from green.homeunix.org (pcp04371970pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net [69.140.223.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC97543D5A; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:50:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7GJo6pH027853; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:50:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: (from green@localhost) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i7GJo6VW027852; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:50:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:50:05 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: Sergey Matveychuk Message-ID: <20040816195005.GN980@green.homeunix.org> References: <20040815222946.53690.qmail@web13421.mail.yahoo.com> <4120EC70.9050804@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4120EC70.9050804@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: "George V. Neville-Neil" cc: Vitaly Markitantov cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: lnc0 in VmWare doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:50:08 -0000 On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:18:40PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Vitaly Markitantov wrote: > > >I found what is the cause of problem with lnc0. > >it's commited vm_contig.c from Thu Aug 5 14:54:12 PDT 2004 ( > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-August/028854.html ) > > > >I set in /boot/loader.conf > >vm.old_contigmalloc="1" > >and all stuff works fine. > > It does not work for me. I guess if you'll rebuild your kernel with new > drivers it could stops work for you too. The significant difference you should see between vm.old_contigmalloc settings is allocation from the bottom of memory (=1) versus the top (=0). Is lnc(4) providing incorrect information to busdma about what region the DMA can work in? This sounds an awful lot like the call to bus_dma_tag_create(9) is bogus. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\