From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 1 21:40:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7D516A4CE for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:40:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E459343D1D for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:40:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i71LeMhY065986 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:40:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i71LeMFo065985; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:40:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:40:22 GMT Message-Id: <200408012140.i71LeMFo065985@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Brian Buchanan Subject: Re: kern/51583: [PATCH] allow to work with devices and sockets over nullfs [STABLE, 5.0-CURRENT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brian Buchanan List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 21:40:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/51583; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brian Buchanan To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/51583: [PATCH] allow to work with devices and sockets over nullfs [STABLE, 5.0-CURRENT] Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 14:33:55 -0700 (PDT) The reason it fails in case #3 is that vp->v_socket is being set on the upper layer by unp_bind(), but not on the lower layer, because that code is ignorant of filesystem layering. I'm not sure what the best fix is for this. Is it acceptable to have null_lookup simply return the lower vnode when it's of type VSOCK, or would that break something else?