From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov  4 09:04:31 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id JAA07384
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 09:04:31 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA07375
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 09:04:24 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA07839; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 09:03:43 -0800
To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Hmmmm! `resvport' keyword not documented *anywhere*? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 04 Nov 1995 11:56:53 EST."
             <9511041656.AA07290@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 1995 09:03:43 -0800
Message-ID: <7836.815504623@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Find it difficult all you want, but that is the correct syntax.

Well, I just checked and you're right.  My apologies.  I'm still
thinking "yuck", mind you, since none of the other "commonly used"
option names have dashes preceeding them and I have to wonder why
`resvport' was added as a keyword in the first place if nobody was
even going to bother to document it.  Sigh.

					Jordan