From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 13:04:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CAA106566C for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264D78FC08 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so2854730vcm.13 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:04:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZnfYh8J/j0EK0VAS+tkNt4dM3yuvfI4oD4/r6ZT/1u0=; b=HthQkBDxJuWBLc6R+iOV6h1Y5FezM40BqN8S755pug7QRJnWAnjI2McOINN/8JJsu7 4+CyRZgl8PjVtH0f6YvBQIr2F8H4wV+Vr4n3GvLjOT1tfDLMdOpp+W78RTFTUZ7cwIYY Io0S+B6yINGzxmY+y+/8LOE9Yr8Dh2h1lQSZpSkUYmWHZVl9iDBEJq/qttI2QI8Uk4VN PFtWlX1gc+A5PJT6MdWIpKxtvFnj3FzJHER0tHBZaUiHTRgOP0gCh+vlX1ASxrem2dwd WAA8AmCgg1QAIxPuPSmNUNS3NcVtdVUtsIVhDcztCAHs5rJ5BUCXrCvndMNx11ZSvuON m4GA== Received: by 10.52.240.171 with SMTP id wb11mr573501vdc.106.1334322279392; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:04:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.189.72 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:04:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86pqbbde96.fsf@mars.foo> References: <4F85FF2E.3000309@roladder.net> <86pqbbde96.fsf@mars.foo> From: Christer Solskogen Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:04:19 +0200 Message-ID: To: Florian Unglaub Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel turbo mode support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:04:40 -0000 On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Florian Unglaub wrote: > I tried it with your powerd flags and the performance_cpu_freq setting > on HIGH, but still the maximum freq_levels entry is 2800. > How far should it go, then? -- chs,