From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Mar 24 09:39:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA20668
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 09:39:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA20660
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 09:39:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA22977; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 10:24:11 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199703241724.KAA22977@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Cool Web page interface to mail + search engine?
To: jfieber@indiana.edu (John Fieber)
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 10:24:11 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, langfod@dihelix.com, hasty@rah.star-gate.com,
        hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970324121850.2803D-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> from "John Fieber" at Mar 24, 97 12:25:30 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > We still don't message-ID stamp the messages on receipt by majordomo,
> > do we?
> 
> I don't know where they are getting stamped, but 100% of the
> ~40,000 messages I grabbed for header field analysis had
> message-ID fields, and the presence of in-reply-to fields was a
> very close match with subject lines beginning with "Re:". 

Look at Robert Withrow's messages (or anyone else using exmh).

The "Message-ID:" is being provided by the mail clients, but not
in all cases.


					Regards,
					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.