From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Dec 19 06:23:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA12430 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 06:23:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA12402 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 06:23:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA09587; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 06:22:01 -0800 (PST) To: Narvi cc: Terry Lambert , dkelly@hiwaay.net, FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Back to sysinstall (was Re: Fortran in the base system (was Re: sysinstall)) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 19 Dec 1998 16:15:53 +0200." Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 06:21:58 -0800 Message-ID: <9576.914077318@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > a) to get the new package system, we need good C/C++ compiler yes. > b) to get good C/C++ compiler, we need TenDRA Wrong. 2.8.1 or egcs 1.1.1 have all been proven by the author to do the job just fine, either choice being sufficient for our purposes. The only question is whether to take gcc 2.8.1 and risk more immediate obsolescence or take egcs and risk unending war over the threads question. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message