From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Jan 9 10:35:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.scc.nl (node1374.a2000.nl [62.108.19.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1957D14E1C for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 10:35:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA78200 for emulation@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 19:24:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by dwarf.hq.scc.nl with netnews for emulation@FreeBSD.org (emulation@FreeBSD.org) To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2000 19:23:57 +0100 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <3878D23D.9C38C114@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20000109151828.A2821@merlin.rz.tu-clausthal.de> Subject: Re: rt_sigsuspend (linux) needed for staroffice5 on -stable Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ronald Kuehn wrote: > that the staroffice5 port (tested with ports/german/staroffice5) > doesn't work under -stable (as of today). During installation > it tries to run setup.bin which dies with SIGSYS (12). > It turns out that it wants to call rt_sigsuspend. > This is not present in -stable as of now. Would it be > possible to MFC it? Yes, I read the mail from Marcel Moolenaar > from (1999-12-30) about it: > > "rt_sigsuspend should not be implemented on -stable, because it breaks > more than it fixes. setresuid is not implemented in -current (yet)." > > So is there no chance at all to get staroffice 5.1a running on -stable? I'm aware of the problem and will take a look at it as soon as possible. -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:marcel@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message